Blog
Compliance isn't
a constraint.
It's a competitive advantage.
64
articles
103
categories
FR/EN
languages
It's a competitive advantage.
The EU AI Act doesn't end at deployment. Articles 72 and 73 impose ongoing post-market monitoring and incident reporting obligations on providers and deployers of high-risk AI. Here is what you must track, log, and report — and when.
Article 13 of the EU AI Act requires high-risk AI systems to be sufficiently transparent — but what does that actually demand? This guide breaks down the technical and operational transparency obligations providers must meet, and what deployers need to receive.
Article 14 of the EU AI Act requires high-risk AI systems to be designed for effective human oversight — but human in the loop is not the same as meaningful control. This deep dive explains what Article 14 actually demands, who bears the obligations, and what genuine oversight looks like in practice.
Law firms use AI every day — and many don't realise they have EU AI Act obligations. Whether you deploy third-party legal AI tools or advise clients on compliance, this guide explains exactly what applies to you, and how DILAIG can help.
"Algorithmic audit" and "GenAI audit" are not interchangeable. One targets classical ML systems and automated decision-making; the other targets large language models and generative AI. Confusing them leaves real compliance gaps — especially under the EU AI Act.
Non-compliance with the AI ACT isn't just a fine — it's a business-ending risk. This guide reveals the real consequences of violations: from €35M fines to criminal liability, reputation ruin, and lost market access. Plus: how DILAIG helps you avoid the worst.
6 of 12