Compliance isn't
a constraint.
It's a competitive advantage.
It's a competitive advantage.
Article 72 of the EU AI Act requires high-risk AI providers to maintain an active post-market monitoring system throughout the system's lifetime. This guide explains what the plan must contain, how it connects to incident reporting under Article 73, and the key deadlines.
Article 71 of the EU AI Act requires providers and, in some cases, deployers of high-risk AI systems to register in the EU database before placing their system on the market. This step-by-step guide covers who must register, what data to submit, and the most common mistakes to avoid.
Article 73 of the EU AI Act imposes strict incident reporting obligations on providers of high-risk AI systems. Learn the legal definition of a "serious incident," who must notify whom, and within what deadlines — including the 2-calendar-day rule for life-threatening situations.
Article 13 of the EU AI Act requires providers of high-risk AI systems to supply deployers with precise, structured instructions for use. Discover the eight mandatory content elements, the most common drafting mistakes, and a section-by-section template you can adapt today.
Any AI provider established outside the EU that places high-risk AI systems on the European market must appoint an EU-based authorised representative under Article 22 of the AI Act. This article explains who qualifies, what the mandate covers, and how to avoid the enforcement traps that catch most non-EU providers off guard.
Public contracting authorities that deploy high-risk AI systems are now deployers under Article 26 of the EU AI Act, with legal obligations that must flow through procurement contracts. This guide explains the mandatory clauses, CE marking verification steps, and the five-step process every public buyer needs before awarding an AI contract.
6 of 11